Supporting USB 3.1 and higher, a type-C cable is capable of connecting to both smartphones and laptops using the same reversible receptacle, unlike the Micro USB port that works on phones alone and can only support the outdated USB 2.0 version. It is used to connect mobile, compact devices like photo printers, Mp3 players, smartphones, GPS devices, and. Faster, leaner, and more reliable, the USB-C technology is designed to replace the confusing mess of USB cables in the market with a single type of cable. The mini version of USB is known as Micro USB. The USB Type-C connector succeeds the Micro-USB standard. What Are The Differences Between Micro USB and USB-C? Only found in smartphones needs a Micro-USB to standard USB convertor for connecting with PCsĬan connect to any USB-C device, including smartphones, tablets, and even laptops Reversible can be inserted in any orientation Supports Fast Charging through PDM, potentially exceeding even 100W of powerĬan only be inserted in a specific orientation Using the supplied Micro-USB cable, upload rides to our GPS Root website for. No Fast Charging support can only supply 7.5W of power Developed for easy use and setup, the Macro Easy GPS is a cycling computer. Gives a minimum data transfer speed of 5GBps Offers a maximum data transfer speed of 480Mbps This is in sharp contrast to the standard USB’s limit of 7.5W only. The Power Delivery Mode even allows a USB-C cable to charge larger devices like laptops and tablets by supplying more than 100W of power. Only Type-C connectors can implement the new USB Power Delivery Mode (PDM), allowing for superfast charging of even the bulkiest phones. How can someone tell the junk from high quality fast charging cables? As far as I know there is no quick and easy way.And that’s another scenario in which USB-C trumps Micro USB. Not having the USB icon on a cable can mean it's a cheap piece of junk or a heavy duty fast charging phone charger cable. They do this by using the data pins on the USB connectors in the cable to identify the cable to the charger and phone.
#Macro vs micro usb android#
Many Android devices use cables built to handle more power than USB allows for charging faster than USB would allow, this means needing a way to tell a USB cable from a cable built for more power. Not having the USB icon does not mean it won't work as a USB data cable, only that it has not been tested to comply with the USB spec.
#Macro vs micro usb serial#
What it comes down to is that cables tested to meet the USB spec on power and data will have the USB icons on it. Micro USB is a miniaturized version of the Universal Serial Bus ( USB ) interface developed for connecting compact and mobile devices such as smartphones, MP3 players, GPS devices, photo printers and digital cameras.
#Macro vs micro usb how to#
There's a long story that would explain how we got here but not answer the question on how to tell the cables apart. The cables not transferring USB data is a side effect of phone makers choosing USB as the standard means to charge phones. Most of them (the majority) charge the device but don't recognize it when connected. I have quite a few micro USB cables but not all of them allow me connect my Android device to my computer (I've tried both on linux and Windows). Places that use trademarks without permission tend to get sued into oblivion quite quickly and easily so cables that don't meet the USB spec and have the USB icons on them are rare. To get permission to use the USB trademarks on cables requires proving the cables meet the USB specifications on data and power. It is not illegal to make junk cables but it is illegal to use trademarks without permission. Look for the USB "trident" trademarked icon. Is there any way for me to be able to recognize if a micro USB cable is good for data transfer as opposed to just charging? Please post as a comment if you find this to be wrong.
One of the cords with the missing logo had a paper flag/label that said it's only a charging cable, further qualifying that it does not transfer data. I don't know if that's a standard for all manufacturers, but I seriously doubt the random ones I was looking at were the same brand.
After looking at 2-3 of them last night looking for a data cable, I realized that "fact". However, this is apparently missing on the "charge only" cords. On the ends of a USB cable, there is normally the USB logo: I know this question is a little old, but I figured it out last night, I believe. It's pretty bad when a standard isn't standard. It's "good enough" for most things, but I've seen charge-only cables with the USB logo and data cables missing the logo. Edit: After some more research and experience, as well as a comment below, this isn't a 100% tell.
0 kommentar(er)
